thoughts on loneliness, part II
varieties of loneliness
in spite of the fact that loneliness is a kind of pain, it can also have a certain appeal. it is perhaps not too strong to say that loneliness can at times be almost pleasant. part of the pleasure, i think, is that loneliness can somehow make one feel important or significant. i am thinking of the connection between loneliness and the 'romantic hero' -the person who, because of his uniqueness or greatness, must somehow struggle on alone, isolated and perhaps misunderstood. that picture, of course, is a bit overblown. but when we feel lonely, i think we can pretty easily see ourselves along similar lines, or at least feel that there is something special about us in our isolation. and perhaps that is part of the pleasure of loneliness: it can make us feel important, individual.
"happy being lonely...
lonely being happy..."
-b.m.
that said, we can also distinguish between a "light loneliness", in which these kind of pleasures may be present, and a "heavy loneliness" in which there are no such pleasures. by "heavy loneliness", i mean a loneliness is that is utterly oppressive, a loneliness in which we lose contact with the things that bring us joy, with the things we love, with our best selves. the contrast between "light loneliness" and "heavy loneliness" is similar to (perhaps even the same as) the contrast between "melancholy" and "depression." while both melancholy and depression are kinds of sadness, the former can be somehow attractive, while the latter holds no attraction. in melancholy, one can feel important or even ennobled. melancholy can make you feel serious, important. in contrast, depression reduces a person. it makes you feel insignificant, lifeless, less yourself, less a person. the same sort of dynamic can be present, i think, between light and heavy forms of loneliness.
so, what should we make of the pleasures that might accompany a "light loneliness"? for one thing, i think it suggests that loneliness can be a temptation. insofar as loneliness does involve the sense of one's own grand individuality, indulging in loneliness runs the risk of giving into pride. when we are lonely, it might be some consolation to cultivate the feeling because it reminds us of some exalted view of ourselves in which we are somehow above others -"brilliant but misunderstood, etc" i don't at all mean to say that feeling loneliness is a "sin." rather, i mean that there is a posture that we can take towards loneliness, and towards the pleasures in it, that can express a distorted, even sinful, view of ourselves.
at the same time, however, i think its all to easy to scoff at the romantic hero, or to write him off as adolescent and self-involved (no doubt this is part of our desire to distance ourselves from our own adolescence). but isn't there, after all, some truth in the much-maligned notion of "individualism"? what i mean is this: in some deep way, we live alone and we die alone. in some deep way, we make our choices alone and we alone bear responsibility for ourselves. that is (part of) what it means to be a self. so, perhaps we can say: the pain of loneliness is a reminder of the weight we bear as individuals, the weighting of being a self. moreover, perhaps we feel that there is something wonderful in the fact that we are each individuals, that i am a free and rational person. and insofar as loneliness reminds us of this, the pain of loneliness reminds us something profound about ourselves, and it carries with it something sweet, something inspiring.
loneliness and truth
i'm not sure if the above paragraph makes sense. and to the extent that it does make sense, i don't know ifs ultimately a fruitful way to think about loneliness. but i do think that we should be thinking seriously about the question "how should we deal with our experiences of loneliness?" and i think the case of "romantic loneliness" shows how our answers to this question will ultimately depend on whether or not we think there is a truth in our loneliness, and if so, what that truth is.
what i mean is this: if loneliness is a kind of pained perception -of oneself and one's situation- then we ought to be asking: "is this an accurate perception?" answering that question, of course, involves making lots of fine-grained distinctions in our experience of loneliness, and figuring out just what a given experience of loneliness is claiming. in the case of romantic loneliness, my thought was that this kind of loneliness might be a perception built around a picture of oneself that has some truth in it. if that were the case, then this kind of loneliness would be truth-tracking, as it were. and a truth-tracking kind of loneliness, it seems, is something that we should attend to.
on the other hand, it might be that certain experiences of loneliness represent distorted perceptions of ourselves and our situation. for example, it might be that an experience of loneliness makes us feel that we have no important connection to anyone in the world, and that feeling might simply be false. in that case, the correct approach to this feeling might involve (among other things) recognizing to ourselves that what we are feeling is not a truth-tracking emotion or mood.
of course, this suggests that it will be hard to say some things about loneliness without resorting to our broader view of things. that is, in trying to figure out whether an experience of loneliness tells us something true or false, or is healthy or unhealthy, we will be drawing on our ideas of just what a human being is, and what good human action and feeling involves. i am thinking of such questions as: what does it mean to say that human beings are social animals? what kind of isolation is upbuilding for a person, and what kind of isolation is destructive? and in the grand scheme of things, just how alone are we?
as christians, i think all this means that we need something like a "theology of loneliness." such a theology would address, among other things:
-what is the relationship between loneliness and our fallen human nature?
-can all loneliness be removed this side of heaven? should we strive for that?
-in what ways can loneliness be a part of our redemption as individuals? as a community?
-was jesus lonely? if so, what is the meaning of jesus loneliness for us?
-what light does the fact of loneliness shed on the meaning of the church?
-how does loneliness relate to our confession of the trinity -to our belief that in God's very being there is a society of persons?
these are, for the most part, just some questions of the top my head. i don't have much constructive to say in this area, though it seems to me that the church would do well to think more deeply about loneliness, not least because of how quickly loneliness often besets us, how pervasive it is, and also how much time and effort we spend fending it off. that said, it may also be that the best way to begin in this area is to think more deeply about the good things for which loneliness longs -intimacy, presence, love.
in spite of the fact that loneliness is a kind of pain, it can also have a certain appeal. it is perhaps not too strong to say that loneliness can at times be almost pleasant. part of the pleasure, i think, is that loneliness can somehow make one feel important or significant. i am thinking of the connection between loneliness and the 'romantic hero' -the person who, because of his uniqueness or greatness, must somehow struggle on alone, isolated and perhaps misunderstood. that picture, of course, is a bit overblown. but when we feel lonely, i think we can pretty easily see ourselves along similar lines, or at least feel that there is something special about us in our isolation. and perhaps that is part of the pleasure of loneliness: it can make us feel important, individual.
"happy being lonely...
lonely being happy..."
-b.m.
that said, we can also distinguish between a "light loneliness", in which these kind of pleasures may be present, and a "heavy loneliness" in which there are no such pleasures. by "heavy loneliness", i mean a loneliness is that is utterly oppressive, a loneliness in which we lose contact with the things that bring us joy, with the things we love, with our best selves. the contrast between "light loneliness" and "heavy loneliness" is similar to (perhaps even the same as) the contrast between "melancholy" and "depression." while both melancholy and depression are kinds of sadness, the former can be somehow attractive, while the latter holds no attraction. in melancholy, one can feel important or even ennobled. melancholy can make you feel serious, important. in contrast, depression reduces a person. it makes you feel insignificant, lifeless, less yourself, less a person. the same sort of dynamic can be present, i think, between light and heavy forms of loneliness.
so, what should we make of the pleasures that might accompany a "light loneliness"? for one thing, i think it suggests that loneliness can be a temptation. insofar as loneliness does involve the sense of one's own grand individuality, indulging in loneliness runs the risk of giving into pride. when we are lonely, it might be some consolation to cultivate the feeling because it reminds us of some exalted view of ourselves in which we are somehow above others -"brilliant but misunderstood, etc" i don't at all mean to say that feeling loneliness is a "sin." rather, i mean that there is a posture that we can take towards loneliness, and towards the pleasures in it, that can express a distorted, even sinful, view of ourselves.
at the same time, however, i think its all to easy to scoff at the romantic hero, or to write him off as adolescent and self-involved (no doubt this is part of our desire to distance ourselves from our own adolescence). but isn't there, after all, some truth in the much-maligned notion of "individualism"? what i mean is this: in some deep way, we live alone and we die alone. in some deep way, we make our choices alone and we alone bear responsibility for ourselves. that is (part of) what it means to be a self. so, perhaps we can say: the pain of loneliness is a reminder of the weight we bear as individuals, the weighting of being a self. moreover, perhaps we feel that there is something wonderful in the fact that we are each individuals, that i am a free and rational person. and insofar as loneliness reminds us of this, the pain of loneliness reminds us something profound about ourselves, and it carries with it something sweet, something inspiring.
loneliness and truth
i'm not sure if the above paragraph makes sense. and to the extent that it does make sense, i don't know ifs ultimately a fruitful way to think about loneliness. but i do think that we should be thinking seriously about the question "how should we deal with our experiences of loneliness?" and i think the case of "romantic loneliness" shows how our answers to this question will ultimately depend on whether or not we think there is a truth in our loneliness, and if so, what that truth is.
what i mean is this: if loneliness is a kind of pained perception -of oneself and one's situation- then we ought to be asking: "is this an accurate perception?" answering that question, of course, involves making lots of fine-grained distinctions in our experience of loneliness, and figuring out just what a given experience of loneliness is claiming. in the case of romantic loneliness, my thought was that this kind of loneliness might be a perception built around a picture of oneself that has some truth in it. if that were the case, then this kind of loneliness would be truth-tracking, as it were. and a truth-tracking kind of loneliness, it seems, is something that we should attend to.
on the other hand, it might be that certain experiences of loneliness represent distorted perceptions of ourselves and our situation. for example, it might be that an experience of loneliness makes us feel that we have no important connection to anyone in the world, and that feeling might simply be false. in that case, the correct approach to this feeling might involve (among other things) recognizing to ourselves that what we are feeling is not a truth-tracking emotion or mood.
of course, this suggests that it will be hard to say some things about loneliness without resorting to our broader view of things. that is, in trying to figure out whether an experience of loneliness tells us something true or false, or is healthy or unhealthy, we will be drawing on our ideas of just what a human being is, and what good human action and feeling involves. i am thinking of such questions as: what does it mean to say that human beings are social animals? what kind of isolation is upbuilding for a person, and what kind of isolation is destructive? and in the grand scheme of things, just how alone are we?
as christians, i think all this means that we need something like a "theology of loneliness." such a theology would address, among other things:
-what is the relationship between loneliness and our fallen human nature?
-can all loneliness be removed this side of heaven? should we strive for that?
-in what ways can loneliness be a part of our redemption as individuals? as a community?
-was jesus lonely? if so, what is the meaning of jesus loneliness for us?
-what light does the fact of loneliness shed on the meaning of the church?
-how does loneliness relate to our confession of the trinity -to our belief that in God's very being there is a society of persons?
these are, for the most part, just some questions of the top my head. i don't have much constructive to say in this area, though it seems to me that the church would do well to think more deeply about loneliness, not least because of how quickly loneliness often besets us, how pervasive it is, and also how much time and effort we spend fending it off. that said, it may also be that the best way to begin in this area is to think more deeply about the good things for which loneliness longs -intimacy, presence, love.